sandyw
Wed, 22 Mar 2006 17:02:00 GMT
re: Air Muscle Actuators
Hi Matt. I had a demo too, a couple of years back, and bought one of the
non-servo versions to play with, plus a couple of proportional valves. The valves are interesting when pulled to bits - a car tyre valve and a couple of centimetres of nitinol memory wire. I wonder if you didn't like the demo because of the 'hunting' in the control... I figure that this is because of the time lag in the valves they use, the heating up of the nitinol takes a good old fraction of a second. I already had my own system up and running using a more robust muscle made by german company Festo and different valves - no hunting! I have a love-hate relationship with air-muscle technology though - also played with the Shadow robotics muscle, very similar in construction to the Merlin - basically something like bicycle inner tube inside some plastic
electricians braiding. Friction between these surfaces is a source of wear, so the operational life is not suitable for theme-park use. Festo's 'fluidic muscle' uses a high tech cross-woven composite material and has a longer lifespan - we built a Chistmas animatronic last year which employed over 40 of them, and had several failures over just a few months, alas still don't know exactly why they failed exactly... I've ranted!!! ;) Do you think a muscle with precise control, just like an r/c servo could have a place in film animatronics?